A university is a workplace and a place of study at the same time, and the two populations do not share a vocabulary. The university edition asks students about study, supervision and belonging in the words they use, while staff can run the workplace edition, with its psychosocial hazards duty, on the same platform.
Institutions routinely measure student experience and staff engagement in separate systems, on different models, a year apart. Running both here means the same underlying model, the same period and the same benchmark methodology, so "are our students struggling more than our staff" becomes a question with an answer.
Organisations that have run the evaluation (sometimes called a staff or student wellbeing survey) include the University of Melbourne, Melbourne Business School, Kansas State University, Old Dominion University, Northern Kentucky University, Monash University Community Services and IDP Education.
Multi-rater 360° views, cross-institution benchmarks on the university edition, and read-aloud in seventeen languages, which matters more in a cohort where a large share of students are studying in their second or third language.
For staff, reported through the same four standards as the workplace edition.
How people treat each other across faculties, teams and classrooms.
Belonging, clarity and fairness across the individual, the team and the institution.
Financial pressure on staff and postgraduates, and how far it follows them to work.
Yes. Both run on the same model, in the same period, with the same benchmark method, so the two results can be compared directly.
Yes. The university edition carries the psychosocial hazards module, reported through four standards.
Read-aloud covers seventeen languages, and there are three ways to answer: a conversation, a card deck or a classic form.
Benchmarks are per edition, so you are compared with other institutions running the university edition.